World Libertarian Order

Hackers, Spam, Censorship
Home | Send the WLO to Geneva | Policy for Internet Discussion Groups | A Word to Free Market Economists | World Libertarian Order | Introduction | Liberty and Natural Order | Spending and Lending | Economics and Power | History and Propaganda | Evolution and Devolution | Charity and Welfare | Society and Apathy | Government and Collectivism | Enemies and Strategies | Solutions and Implementation | World Libertarian Revolution | A New Look at Western Civilization | World Power Through Misdirection | The New World Order | Options for the Future | A Further Declaration of Independence | Ten Steps to World Libertarian Revolution | Amendments to the US Constitution | Letter from Timothy McVeigh | September 11 / World War III | Objective View of Terrorism | Speed Traps | The War on Drugs | Soaring Medical Costs | Sanctioning of Marriage | Hackers, Spam, Censorship | Mega Business Frauds | Noise Pollution | Libertarian Organizations | Links for Liberty and Peace | Evolutionary Psychology | The Secret Bunker | Olympic Games | WLO Kid Page | WLO Animal Page

 
 
May 28, 2003
 
Web Hackers:
 
Under certain circumstances large numbers of people could die because of ruined Internet access. Hackers who tamper with the lives of others for their sick ammusement should be tried and convicted for attempted mass murder. Let's see how amused they are by life in prison.
 
Email Spam:
 
We cannot ban unsolicited E-mail without banning capitalism itself. If we analyze the situation it becomes clear that the real problem is not spam, but the amount. This occurs because E-mail is free. We need only insist that reason prevail.
 
Our suggestion for legislation is that the amount of spam sent to any one address should be limited to one ad per week for two months followed by one ad per month thereafter.
 
It should be illegal for the sender to use an address that the recipient cannot reply to. The addressee should be able to request removal from any and all lists and that his address not be sold. These requests must be honored.
 
Unexpected pop-over windows should be illegal. Expected pop-over windows and normal pop-under windows are not a problem. There should be severe penalties, however, for using windows which cannot be closed without rebooting the computer. This should also apply to windows which automatically minimize or maximize other windows.
 
Huge avalanches of spam and unclosable windows are not acceptable behavior among decent business people. Such practices are clear encroachments and should be illegal.
 
These simple measures will get rid of all the real problems associated with spam in a way which is consistent with individual Liberty and free enterprise. Until we have proper legislation, people can only boycott those who reach the point of immorality in their business aggressiveness(1).

Fight Spam on the Internet

 
 
August 17, 2005
 
Internet Censorship
 
Everywhere there are libraries, community centers, and senior centers which provide Internet access to the general public. Everywhere also there is arbitrary censorship.
 
Community institutions will, of course, ultimately be paid for by user fees, but even when they are, the same problems of access could arise and must be addressed as a separate issue.
 
Unfortunately, many of the present institutions are controlled by people who have no respect for individuality or Liberty. Their computer labs are funded with public money, but their viewing polices are based upon personal values being touted as the "community standard".
 
All decent people want an end to both child and snuff pornography. Both involve the worst type of encroachment against the victims used in production. But these are the exceptions.
 
The general rule in a free society must be to allow no unnecessary censorship. The narrow and particular must not be allowed to interfere with Liberty on the Internet or anywhere else(2).

Footnotes:
 
1. The author receives 250 spam letters every day. Usually there are several different persons who send from 3 to 8 each. In one case recently, until it was discovered and stopped, there were 40 every day from one person, but disguised to look like it was from many different people.
 
2. A friend of ours tells us about public access in his home town. "The public libraries are great. Their access policy is American and based on the Bill of Rights. Unfortunately, certain of our community centers are controlled by people who are not healthy psychologically and have jealous contempt for those who are. The censorship reflects their personal problems. We have pantywaist religous fanatics and domineering lesbians acting as incompetent webmasters. At one center the system is so misconfigured that if there is a word the webmaster disapproves of in the subject line of an Email letter you can't even open the inbox to file or delete the letter".