Social Planning by and for Bankers
The long term goal of a certain powerful segment of the
international financial community is absolute economic domination of the world through monopoly. Fiat monetary policy produces
the trade deficits which lead to international hostilities. One of the primary methods used to exploit this has been to make
the world so unsafe with military proliferation that it will seem that the only way to save humanity is to eliminate trade
deficits by establishing a one world government and monetary system. This would involve central computer debit cards
with purchasing units replacing currencies. Even with this system it would still be possible to increase the "money" supply,
and using the card would completely destroy privacy as to one's whereabouts.
The next step is the relinquishing of
sovereignty of all nations to a one world government. This is what is called the "New World Order." This would give the
internationalists total monopoly with nowhere for liberty loving individuals to run. There can be no off-shore accounts when
there is no off-shore. If all this is allowed to happen then individual liberty on Earth will effectively be a thing
of the past.
To have one world government not based upon Libertarian principles would be the worse fate, short of
total nuclear war, that man could ever inflict upon himself. Complete control by international finance would accelerate the
trend of the Twenty First Century in making the quality of existence on earth progressively worse (11). It would mean the
endless artificial sustenance of primitive peoples through the continued victimization of advanced peoples. This kind of globally
institutionalized bloodsucking would effectively put an end to the evolutionary destiny of mankind on this planet.
Third-world people usually favor globalization because it will allow
them to prosper via social programs paid for by productive host populations. NWO bankers know that countries with
legions of immigrant third-worlders, if globalization comes to a ballot referendum, will be far more
likely to relinquish sovereignty. This is the reason for all the new indigent faces in productive countries.
Propaganda for these policies has already begun to appear in everyday television shows.
Here we find fashionable young college types falsely, but very matter-of-factly referring to the "New World Order" as though
it were an impending utopia of great opportunity for all. Dissenting individuals are portrayed as racial bigots and violent
rednecks.
A suggested exercise for college students would be to determine, from employment and entitlement statistics,
the ratio between the total numbers of producing and non-producing people on the entire Earth. The next step is to compare
this to the current ratios in existing separate nations and to assess from this what would be the average effect of a one
world economy upon the standard of living of producing people on earth as a whole.
Even the Great Plague of medieval
times ultimately benefited humanity by reducing excess numbers. It increased the quality of consumption by diminishing the
quantity of consumers. A collectivist world government would have the opposite effect. Ultimately the numbers might be reduced
by a new plague, but not until most of the beauty of this planet, the general quality of human manifestation, and the simple
morality which accompanies joy in living had been utterly destroyed. This is already happening almost everywhere on Earth
now. The rate is increasing.
Can the reader think of a single movie or television series which portrays a peaceful
and productive Libertarian future on Earth? Entertainment now usually involves only themes of destruction and control rather
than building and personal growth. Most of the human advances postulated are based only upon technology or individual prowess
such as empathy or telepathy. The future is portrayed as Post-Apocalyptic with the same old crew running things and the
people racing around devastated landscapes in souped-up jalopies killing each other over life's basic necessities like
fuel (12).
The efforts of the international bankers are aided and abetted by the short sighted reactionism of
brainwashed masses whose limp-wristed spirituality and collectivist values lead them to support banker approved politicians.
These candidates promise the immediate triumph of "good" if certain sacrifices, namely individual liberties, are lovingly
made. Everything will turn out fine "if we all just work together." Actually all we have to do to have a glowing prosperity
all over the world is simply to strive selfishly, but honorably, on an individual basis in a climate of absolute individual liberty.
Again, there is an interesting, well documented, fact-filled literature dealing very specifically with all of this.
The aspirant is now grimly admonished to pursue understanding in this area. This is not philosophy or "bias," and the truth
cannot be glibly psychologized or slandered away. These facts must be learned and taught to younger people at a grassroots
level. All it takes to make the average mesmerized boob-tuber quickly dismiss verifiable truth out of hand is to have some
subverted, but respected "news" person refer casually to the truth teller as being an "extremist" or a member of some ideological
group, which has been popularly "discredited" by the slandering puppets of international finance.
