|
V. EVOLUTION AND DEVOLUTION
So that we are not accused of overkill, let us acknowledge in advance that we know that the superior viability of Capitalism renders any arguments regarding human evolution superfluous and unnecessary, but we like to illustrate the connection between natural and economic laws. 1. No species, no matter how highly evolved, can go against nature in the long term without bringing about it's own destruction. Man, to survive, must arduously study the laws of nature, because he is the only species on Earth possessing the ability to temporarily violate them. 2. Some who have raised a lion and a lamb to lay down with each other have claimed that this is the natural way for these creatures. Of course it is, when people are giving the lion three big meals a day. 3. The truth seeker will reason deductively from universal principals to their proper application in specific instances. Those not at one with truth will usually reason backwards inductively from exceptional particular instances to false general premises. 4. The laws which govern human interaction are interwoven
with the laws of the ecosphere, are every bit as mysterious, and like the latter, are far too complex to permit regulation
of the consequences which proceed from them. Indeed, the affairs of men and of nature are one, and any attempt to unnecessarily regulate
either is dangerous. One breech of natural law will produce a distortion which seems to call for yet another breech,
and so on. The only way things can be "regulated" in a way consistent with survival on this planet is through a policy
of non-interference with nature in the first place. 11. Natural selection is the principle that organisms manifesting
physiological or behavioral traits having little survival value, will reproduce at a lesser rate than other organisms since
they will not live long enough to do so. This will ultimately cause the trait to die out in the species, unless the particular
organisms manifesting the non-surviving traits are given artificial sustenance that will prolong their lives and periods of
reproduction. 13. When non-self-sustaining organisms are sustained artificially
and end up reproducing when they would not otherwise, then evolution stops and devolution begins. Devolution is the reversal
of evolution. The detriment to evolutionary destiny is even more greatly magnified if the evolutionary expression of self-sustaining
organisms is encroached upon in the process. 19. It seems that among "nice" or "civilized" people, it is quietly and conveniently forgotten that evolution applies as much to humans as to any other species. Cowardly religions even falsely teach in many cases, that evolution is merely a theory. In actuality man has reached the point on the evolutionary ladder where he not only can, but to survive must, determine the direction of his own evolution. This can only be accomplished by working with nature, not against it. 20. Mankind will not survive if societies continue
to be subsidized breeding farms for human non self-sustainability. Recognition of this does not mean that anybody
needs to go hungry or starve. In a Libertarian Republic all people will live long happy lives. Ongoing sustenance of
chronically unemployable people, however, can be provided much more efficiently by means other than coercive government. It
is also possible through education to help these people to greatly curb the encroachment they make by excess reproduction.
21. It is important to note that in a collectivist society the
number of truly non-self-sustaining people is always far fewer than would appear on the surface. The economic
cycle caused by fiat monetary policy pulls down a tremendous number of people to a level of apparent non-self-sustainability.
By getting rid of this one simple ecomic policy alone, unemployment would thereafter not exceed one percent except
in cases of local catastrophe.
22. It has been empirically proven that, through natural selection,
humanity was able to evolve from less complex forms only because nature offers no sustenance to non-self-sustaining organisms.
In man's earlier development he was more at the mercy of nature than today
23. Man has not been able to cheat nature in the longer term. One effect of a warm climate and advancing medical science has been to endlessly thwart natural selection. This has devolved the human species both physically and intellectually. Cro Magnon Man was not only bigger and stronger than Homo Sapiens, but with an average IQ of 165, was a race of geniuses by comparison. The decline in intelligence which we enjoy today was produced by thirty thousand years of warm weather and easy living preceding the last Ice Age (19). 24. More intelligent people tend towards self-actualization at the expense of procreation. Less intelligent people are outbreeding more intelligent people everywhere (20). The diaries of the Roman Emperor-Historian Claudius show that this trend had became a matter of concern even in the time of Augustus, who spoke publicly about it. The problem is accelerating at a more rapid rate today. The excess proliferation of less intelligent humans must be seen as a direct encroachment against all life on this planet if any reasonable quality of life is to be preserved, or ultimately if humanity itself is to survive (21). 25. Because of the prevalence of collectivist ideas, and man's foolish presumption that he can ignore natural law, unproductive humans are protected from the consequences of their own actions. This allows them to reproduce at a rate which they would not be able to sustain ordinarily. Such people see a large number of children as their insurance policy for old age. 26. Experience has shown that when people are prosperous because
of their own activity, as under a Libertarian Capitalist system, that they will restrict their numbers by their own volition.
Non-self-sustaining individuals cannot survive without aid in the short term, or even in the long term, because they will
indiscriminately increase their numbers to the point where even their protectors can no longer help them. When this happens,
famine will cause far more suffering than would have been the case without protectionist interference in the first place.
27. Legislative measures to restrict birth rates among people at lower achievement levels have been proposed, are well thought out, and are technically workable (22). Of course, if we had Libertarian Capitalist economic systems in place, plus education in the schools about the problem of human devolution, such measures would never become necessary. If we are going to do something, however, we had better get on with it, because in just forty more years the population of Earth is going to double. 28. The highest of men on Earth are as much above the lowest, intellectually and spiritually, as the lowest are above the chimpanzees. Those who don't instinctively know this immediately identify themselves as being closer to the low end of the continuum. 29. What an individual learns in a lifetime is to some extent, passed on genetically. The forward progress of evolutionary expression is impeded if productive individuals are kept from learning by being sacrificed for unproductive individuals. Those who work diligently towards the devolution of life on Earth are being masochistic on a cosmic scale. The premise that excellence and evolutionary expression should be even slightly impeded to help sustain mediocrity is the beginning of the worst mistake which humanity could ever make. 30. The intelligent and capable "champion" promoting unjust encroachment by unproductive humanity, is the worst among them, because his inability to behave in a way which is consistent with his own, and our, survival in the long term, comes not from stupidity, but from deep moral inferiority. The truth will never reach these individuals, because they simply lack the capacity to comprehend any concept as exalted as evolutionary destiny. 31. It is a pity how vocal are the people who do not "believe" in the empirically proven fact of evolution, but who do endorse more or less evolutionary social policies. Mixing the ridiculous rhetoric of fanatical religiosity with Capitalist economics brings a popular perception of discredit upon economic truth because of guilt by association. |
|
|